State v. Camp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Florida antifencing statute intended to punish those who knowingly deal in property stolen by others; not intended to convert a third degree felony into a second degree felony merely because the thief sells the property rather than consumes it.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Michielli
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-05-29· cited 257×
• State v. Camp
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-04-09· cited 22×
• State v. Nesta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-26· cited 4×
• State v. Graham
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-26· cited 3×
• State v. Michielli
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-05-23· cited 2×
• Cowhig v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-25· cited 1×
• Salzman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-01-03· cited 1×
• Douglas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-01· cited 1×
• Burch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-10· cited 1×
• State v. Cowhig
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-09-24· cited 1×
• Salzman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-07-16

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Grimes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-29· cited 8×
• Dixon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-01-18· cited 7×