Skip to main content

State v. Calo

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1289

Syllabus

Postconviction relief recast irregular motion jurisdiction. Affirmed. Without establishing that the trial court maintained continuing jurisdiction to review the motion filed 35 years after the final entry of conviction, which must be construed as a belated or successive petition for postconviction relief, based on the arguments presented, the trial court had no authority to do anything but deny the motion for the want of jurisdiction.

Judges: S. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.