State v. Calloway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that two or more offenses are considered to have been committed as part of a “‘single course of conduct’” if during that conduct “‘there was no substantial change in the nature of the criminal objective’” (quoting MODEL SENT’G & CORR. ACT §§ 3-105, 3-107 (1979))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Knight
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-24· cited 52×
• State v. Collicott
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-04-27· cited 51×
• State v. Rienks
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-14· cited 25×
• State v. Boze
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-04-22· cited 21×
• State v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-01-19· cited 20×
• State v. Green
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-12-04· cited 10×
• State v. Henderson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-01-28· cited 10×
• State v. Garnier
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-11-03· cited 9×
• State v. Huff
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-09-08· cited 9×
• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-03-02· cited 4×
• State v. Hayes
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-27· cited 2×
• State v. Contreras
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-06-29· cited 2×
• State v. Westwood
  Washington Supreme Court· 2023-09-07· cited 2×
• State Of Washington v. Amanda C. Knight
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-24
• State of Washington v. James Ray House, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2024-08-15

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Erickson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-12-01· cited 25×
• State v. Adcock
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-02-21· cited 23×