State v. Callier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘hearing officer[s] [have] not merely the power but the duty to render a decree which will, so far as possible, eliminate the discriminatory effects of the past as well as bar like discrimination in the future’’ (emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted)
• employee cannot recover for employer’s acts that occurred more than 180 days prior to filing
• \The analysis of discrimination and retaliation claims under CFEPA is the same as under Title VII\
• ‘‘[w]e have often looked to federal employment discrimination law for guidance in enforc- ing our own antidiscrimination statute’’ (internal quota- tion marks omitted)
• use of the word \shall\ in Section 46a-86 (formerly General Statutes 31-127 ) denotes mandatory rather than discretionary action
• The intent of the Connecticut legislature in adopting the CFEPA was to make the statute coextensive with Title VII; therefore, Connecticut courts look to federal case law for guidance in interpreting that provision of the CFEPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).