State v. Callaghan
Citations
- 107 Wash. 486
- 182 P. 594
- 1919 Wash. LEXIS 794
Syllabus
<p>Indictment and Information (74)—Duplicity—Ways ob Means of Committing Offense—Larceny by False Pretenses. An indictment for aiding and abetting in obtaining $130 by false pretenses is not duplicitous in that it shows that the money was obtained by forging and presenting to the county thirteen false or invalid claims for ten dollars each, the averment as to the obtaining of money being single.</p> <p>Appeal (263)—Record—Statement of Facts. In the absence of statement of facts or bill of exceptions, the supreme court cannot pass upon any question as to the instructions.</p>
Judges: Main
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PettitWashington Supreme Court· 1913-07-30· cited 42×
- State v. GaulWashington Supreme Court· 1915-11-24· cited 20×
- Morgan v. Bankers Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1911-06-08· cited 19×
- State of Washington v. WingardWashington Supreme Court· 1916-07-14· cited 18×
- People v. LuttermoserMichigan Supreme Court· 1900-01-23· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.