State v. Calhoun

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the use of a spotlight did not alter the encounter into a seizure
• holding that the use of a spotlight did not alter the encounter into a seizure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Garcia-Cantu
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-05-07· cited 791×
• State v. Wilkes
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2008-10-10· cited 61×
• State v. Baker
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2004-12-22· cited 35×
• Neale v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2017-06-01· cited 17×
• State v. Rudnitskyy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-29· cited 10×
• State v. Mesenbrink
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-03-13· cited 9×
• State v. Thacker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 9×
• State v. Gilmore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-10-06· cited 8×
• State v. Aronson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 5×
• State v. Beasley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-21· cited 3×
• State v. Garcia-Cantu, Candelario
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-05-07
• State Of Iowa Vs. Richard S. Wilkes
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2008-10-10
• State of Iowa v. Donald Melvin Wittenberg
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2023-04-26
• State of Iowa v. Jaheim Romaine Cyrus
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2023-11-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Warner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-10-24· cited 244×
• State v. Kennedy
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-02-18· cited 196×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-06-08· cited 19×
• State v. Horton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-06-24· cited 18×
• State v. Deptuch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-01-25· cited 8×
• State v. Deptuch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-04-26· cited 7×