Court of Appeals of Washington· 2/23/1981
State v. Cain
Citations
- 624 P.2d 732
- 28 Wash. App. 462
- 1981 Wash. App. LEXIS 2034
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “[a] finger is an object within the meaning and intent of the statute” criminalizing penetration with “an object”
- holding “[a] finger is an object within the meaning and intent of the statute” criminalizing penetration with “an object”
- providing that digital penetration is included in the definition of “sexual intercourse”
- under former RCW 9.79.140(1), the predecessor statute to RCW 9A.44.010, the court concluded that \[a] finger is an object within the meaning and intent of the statute.\
- under former RCW 9.79.140(1), the predecessor statute to RCW 9A.44.010, the court concluded that “[a] finger is an object within the meaning and intent of the statute.”
- a finger is an \object\ under RCW 9A.44.010
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ringold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 252×
- State v. WEAVILLECourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-07-25· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. CifizzariMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-05-14· cited 43×
- State v. BrowningIdaho Court of Appeals· 1993-04-08· cited 29×
- State v. WhetstineSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-02-17· cited 28×
- State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-04-19· cited 15×
- State v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-11-05· cited 10×
- State v. DarrinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-06-28· cited 7×
- KEELEYBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2017-07-01· cited 7×
- State v. ShuckCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-04-18· cited 6×
- State of Iowa v. ZacariasSupreme Court of Iowa· 2021-04-23
- State of Iowa v. Zachary Tyler ZacariasSupreme Court of Iowa· 2021-04-23
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court· 1978-12-28· cited 96×
- Strenge v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court· 1977-09-08· cited 70×
- State Ex Rel. McDonald v. Whatcom County District CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1979-07-12· cited 57×
- State v. RinkesWashington Supreme Court· 1957-01-14· cited 53×
- State v. GayWashington Supreme Court· 1914-12-07· cited 50×
- State v. ReidWashington Supreme Court· 1965-05-13· cited 42×
- State v. BoggsWashington Supreme Court· 1972-03-30· cited 29×
- State v. LangworthyWashington Supreme Court· 1979-05-10· cited 23×
- State v. LangworthyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-07-31· cited 14×
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court· 1978-06-15· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.