State v. Cahill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant's motion for a new trial was granted because the prosecutor unintentionally failed to bring to the jury's attention a witness's prior inconsistent statement already known to the defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. May
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-11-08· cited 86×
• State v. Lewis
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-09-26· cited 7×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Giglio v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
• Napue v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
• Mooney v. Holohan
  Supreme Court· 1935-01-21· cited 1,837×
• People v. Savvides
  New York Court of Appeals· 1956-07-11· cited 203×
• State v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1967-07-05· cited 44×
• Theodore Green v. United States
  First Circuit· 1958-06-13· cited 43×
• The People v. Lueck
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1962-05-25· cited 26×
• John W. McGuinn v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1956-12-06· cited 24×
• Jackson v. United States
  D. New Jersey· 1971-02-26· cited 16×
• People v. Faulkner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-07-20· cited 6×