Skip to main content
· 11/12/2010

State v. Cagnon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • proof of fourth and fifth elements requiring \shock\ or \alarm\ distinguishes felony of open and gross lewdness from \closely similar\ misdemeanor of indecent exposure
  • \Vicarious concern for other people or even disgust does not convert any ordinary indecent exposure case into one for open and gross lewdness\ [quotation omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: K. RODGERS, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.