State v. Cafe Erotica, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “The absolute proscription against any form of off-site advertising impedes the free flow of information and far exceeds the State’s legitimate interest, is an unconstitutional infringement on free speech.”
• resolving challenge to the Act under Central Hudson test without reaching whether the “legislation [was] content-based and therefore . . . subject to strict scrutiny”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).