Skip to main content
· 1/24/2019

State v. C. S. (In re C. S.)

Citations

  • 433 P.3d 507
  • 295 Or. App. 785

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Cook where “the plaintiffs clearly could have sued any time after the pay periods during which they worked a sixth day per week . . . but did not receive overtime for it”
  • “[A] cause of action to recover those wages plus liquidated damages under the FLSA was available to plaintiffs immediately following those pay periods, when it was clear that their paychecks included neither overtime pay nor liquidated damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aoyagi, Dehoog, Hadlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.