· 1/24/2019
State v. C. S. (In re C. S.)
Citations
- 433 P.3d 507
- 295 Or. App. 785
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing Cook where “the plaintiffs clearly could have sued any time after the pay periods during which they worked a sixth day per week . . . but did not receive overtime for it”
- “[A] cause of action to recover those wages plus liquidated damages under the FLSA was available to plaintiffs immediately following those pay periods, when it was clear that their paychecks included neither overtime pay nor liquidated damages.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aoyagi, Dehoog, Hadlock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.