State v. C. F. P. (In re C. F. P.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the Constitution has been interpreted as a social contract between the Government and people of the United States,” but holding that the plaintiff’s constitutional claim was “not a contract claim within the meaning of the Tucker Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).