State v. Byrd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that when the fact of a defendant’s arrest is necessary to provide a complete story of the crime itself, such testimony is relevant and not unduly prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Hyder v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-01-15· cited 30×
• State v. Allen
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-05-15· cited 10×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Schantz
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-06-23· cited 126×
• State v. Villavicencio
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-01-08· cited 80×
• State v. Green
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-04-03· cited 22×
• State v. Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-02-27· cited 21×
• State v. Albe
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-11-04· cited 14×
• State v. Hutton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 8×
• State v. Milton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-10-05· cited 4×