State v. Bynes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Prohibition is appropriate to prevent a trial court from proceeding contrary to an appellate court's mandate.\ (citing InPhyNet Contracting Servs., Inc. v. Soria, 82 So. 3d 1049, 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Martinez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-12· cited 8×
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. JERRY PHARISIEN
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-04

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wilhelm v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-19· cited 17×
• Pitts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-11· cited 9×
• Bynes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-24· cited 8×
• Bynes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-14· cited 7×
• Reynolds v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-19· cited 6×
• Inphynet Contracting Services, Inc. v. Soria
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-10-12· cited 3×