Missouri Court of Appeals· 9/16/2002
State v. Butler
Citations
- 88 S.W.3d 126
- 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1901
- 2002 WL 31050865
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the defendant’s pants were unzipped when officers located him alone in his car by the payphone where the calls to the victim originated, yet still holding the evidence sufficient to support a finding that the defendant was the audience of a sexual performance
- noting that the defendant’s pants were unzipped when officers located him alone in his car by the payphone where the calls to the victim originated, yet still holding the evidence sufficient to support a finding that the defendant was the audience of a sexual performance
- involving same definition from § 556.061(31), RSMo 2000
- involving same definition from § 556.061(31), RSMo 2000
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Garrison, Montgomery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RaglandMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-07-26· cited 17×
- State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-12-10· cited 13×
- State v. TannerMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-04-27· cited 12×
- State v. MarshallMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-01-19· cited 8×
- State of Missouri v. Jacob RaglandMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-07-26
- State of Missouri v. Jeremy BaumMissouri Court of Appeals· 2025-03-04
- State of Missouri v. Jeremy BaumMissouri Court of Appeals· 2024-05-14
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.