Skip to main content

State v. Butler

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 603

Syllabus

Appellant's argument that his prison sentence was \excessive\ and thus contrary to law, because the offenses to which he pleaded guilty did not trigger a presumption that a prison term was necessary, is without merit. Further, in arriving at its sentencing decision, the trial court did not inappropriately consider unindicted allegations of criminal conduct. Judgment affirmed. (Donovan, J., concurring in judgment only.)

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.