State v. Butler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the IAD is no longer applicable once a prisoner has been released from incarceration
• “The purpose of the act is to ‘obviate difficulties in securing speedy trials of persons incarcerated in other jurisdictions and to minimize the time during which there is an inherent danger that a prisoner may forego preferred treatment or rehabilitation benefits.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Larry Johnson
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-01-13· cited 57×
• State v. Julian
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1988-12-09· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Destephano
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-03-07· cited 8×
• State v. Holley
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-03· cited 6×
• State v. Burnett
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-05-24· cited 3×
• Dawes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-28· cited 2×
• Turner v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2015-02-25· cited 1×
• State of Tennessee v. Richard Barefoot
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2015-01-28
• Devine v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-23

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-11-23· cited 35×
• State v. Quiroz
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-06-16· cited 17×
• State v. Oxendine
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-13· cited 10×
• Pristavec v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1985-07-15· cited 7×
• Loane v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1984-10-17· cited 4×