State v. Buswell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• restitution award was sufficiently sup- ported based on evidence that the victim needed to take sev- eral days off of work after being “traumatized” by a robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Page
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-14· cited 12×
• State v. Venable
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-08· cited 4×
• State v. Maughan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-06-09· cited 1×
• State v. Stephens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-19

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Franklin v. Portland Community College
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-02-14· cited 31×
• M. K. F. v. Miramontes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-09-20· cited 27×
• State v. Lobue
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-06· cited 24×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-16· cited 20×
• State v. Andrews
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-01-16· cited 18×
• Mulligan v. Hornbuckle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-22· cited 6×
• State v. Plagmann/Samora
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-17· cited 2×