Skip to main content

State v. Bustos

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 5028

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by imposing consecutive sentences where the trial court's statutorily-required consecutive-sentence findings were not unsupported by the record. The trial court also did not err in applying the sentencing factor under R.C. 2929.12(B)(7), as the record does not fail to support the trial court's finding that appellant's aggravated drug trafficking offenses were committed as part of an organized criminal activity. Judgment affirmed. (Donovan, J., concurring in judgment only.)

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.