State v. Bustos
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 5028
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by imposing consecutive sentences where the trial court's statutorily-required consecutive-sentence findings were not unsupported by the record. The trial court also did not err in applying the sentencing factor under R.C. 2929.12(B)(7), as the record does not fail to support the trial court's finding that appellant's aggravated drug trafficking offenses were committed as part of an organized criminal activity. Judgment affirmed. (Donovan, J., concurring in judgment only.)
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
- State v. WithrowOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 72×
- State v. CastleOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-15· cited 44×
- State v. GrahamOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-26· cited 9×
- State v. LylesOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-26· cited 7×
- State v. HorobinOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-18· cited 6×
- State v. Flores-LopezOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-10· cited 6×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.