State v. Bussiere

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is generally agreed among the authorities that there are three essential elements necessary to constitute a lottery: (1) prize, (2) chance, and (3) consideration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moody v. State Liquor & Lottery Commission
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-02-25· cited 264×
• CUDD v. Aschenbrenner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-12-19· cited 20×
• Mobil Oil Corporation v. Danforth
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1970-06-08· cited 20×
• Blackburn v. Ippolito
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-09-11· cited 17×
• Chenard v. Marcel Motors
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1978-06-02· cited 14×
• Classic Oldsmobile-Cadillac-GMC Truck, Inc. v. State
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-11-04· cited 1×
• Opinion No.
  Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 2003-04-03
• Opinion No.
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 2000-02-02
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 2000-07-02
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1961-07-02

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co.
  Supreme Court· 1954-04-05· cited 208×
• Commonwealth v. Wall
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1936-07-01· cited 42×
• Maughs v. Porter
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1931-11-12· cited 42×
• Lang v. Merwin
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1905-02-21· cited 20×
• Barker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1937-11-11· cited 17×
• State Ex Rel. Line v. Grant
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1956-03-16· cited 11×
• Gray v. Montgomery
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1922-03-16· cited 8×