State v. Bussard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that description of “miscellaneous gold and silver jewelry” was not sufficiently particular, but that “three jars of assorted U.S. coins____ approximately $900 in U.S. currency ($20s and $100s)” was sufficiently particular
• discussing the considerations in determining whether multiple offenses constitute evidence of a “plan” in the context of Rule 404(b)
• refusing to exclude relevant evidence by applying exclusionary concept to noncon-stitutional violations
• refusing to exclude relevant evidence by applying exclusionary concept to nonconstitutional violations
• defects in the return of a warrant, as required by I.C.R. 41(d), do not require suppression
• items that are likely tied to criminal activity do not need to be particularized on a search warrant to be seized when they meet this standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).