State v. Burton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In determining the meaning, of a statute, it must be inferred that statutes specifically excluding certain things evidence the intent of the legislature to include all other things not mentioned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Taub
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-06-28· cited 7×
• Rainey v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-27· cited 6×
• State v. Alexander
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-10-26· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Burns v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-02-21· cited 48×
• State v. Cutler
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-03-18· cited 14×
• State v. Carter
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-05-30· cited 3×