State v. Burtis
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4162
Syllabus
Appeal arguing that trial court failed to properly consider the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and the seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12 when it imposed a prison term of 16 months is moot where the term has been completely served and the appellant has been released from prison.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that \an expert's opinions and conclusions which are based on nothing more than speculation cannot constitute substantial evidence\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.