Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 12/26/2018
State v. Burrows
Citations
- 925 N.W.2d 789
- 2019 WI App 5
- 385 Wis. 2d 515
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting arrest pursuant to a “want” is constitutional so long as it is not used to enter a defendant’s property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reilly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court· 2009-04-21· cited 2,725×
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court· 1971-03-29· cited 1,845×
- James N. Gramenos v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1986-08-29· cited 364×
- State v. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1978-01-03· cited 158×
- State v. SecristWisconsin Supreme Court· 1999-03-02· cited 114×
- State v. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court· 1973-10-15· cited 89×
- State v. FridayWisconsin Supreme Court· 1989-01-11· cited 45×
- Schaffer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-02-15· cited 22×
- State v. EhnertCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1991-01-30· cited 21×
- United States v. Fernandez-GuzmanSeventh Circuit· 1978-05-23· cited 18×
- State v. FridayCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1987-07-16· cited 10×
- Madison v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1974-06-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.