State v. Burris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A statute has the effect of falling within a series only if the legislature says that it falls within the series.”
• “We therefore conclude that the exception for certain older felony convictions in ORS 166.270(4)(a) does not apply to the prohibition on a felon possessing a firearm under ORS 166.250(1)(c)(C).”
• “We therefore conclude that the exception for certain older felony convictions in ORS 166.270(4)(a) does not apply to the prohibition on a felon possessing a firearm under ORS 166.250(1)(c)(C).”
• describing the history of the legislation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hathaway v. B & J Property Investments, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-05-03· cited 9×
• Newman v. Marion County Sheriff's Office
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-10-18· cited 5×
• Mohiadeen v. Washington County Sheriff's Office
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-02-20· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• Eckles v. State of Oregon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-08-04· cited 116×
• Crystal Communications, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-03-07· cited 44×
• State v. Swanson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-11-10· cited 12×
• State v. Burris
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-10· cited 1×