Skip to main content

State v. Burns

Citations

  • 788 P.2d 531
  • 114 Wash. 2d 314
  • 1990 Wash. LEXIS 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the same criminal conduct determination will not be disturbed unless an appellate court “finds a clear abuse of discretion or misapplication of the law”
  • possession of cocaine after the sale of cocaine to one party manifested a separate instance of criminal intent to deliver cocaine in the future
  • possession of cocaine after the sale of cocaine to one party manifested a separate instance of criminal intent to deliver cocaine in the future
  • delivery count required intent to sell in the present, whereas possession with intent to deliver involved intent to sell in the future
  • possession and intent to deliver have different objective intents
  • possession and intent to deliver have different objective intents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dolliver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.