Court of Appeals of Kansas· 9/30/1988
State v. Burnett
Citations
- 762 P.2d 192
- 13 Kan. App. 2d 60
- 1988 Kan. App. LEXIS 677
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \A defendant should not be able to challenge a mistrial declaration and claim double jeopardy where the mistrial was caused by the defense attorney's misconduct or error.\
- \A defendant should not be able to challenge a mistrial declaration and claim double jeopardy where the mistrial was caused by the defense attorney's misconduct or error.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rulon, Six, Elliott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
- United States v. JornSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court· 1824-03-23· cited 1,814×
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court· 1976-03-08· cited 1,492×
- State v. McQueen & HardywaySupreme Court of Kansas· 1978-07-15· cited 38×
- State v. FalkeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-07-26· cited 33×
- State v. FolkertsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1981-06-10· cited 22×
- State v. BatesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1979-07-14· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.