State v. Burks
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1156
Syllabus
Appellant argues that the trial court erred in ordering the payment of a fine as part of his sentence because the court did not assess his present and future ability to pay. The fines were suspended by the trial court and may never become due. There was evidence that the trial court considered appellant's present and future ability to pay the fines, and appellant never raised an issue in the trial court that he lacked a present or future ability to pay. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-31· cited 1,234×
- Keller v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court· 2003-11-05· cited 53×
- State v. KinsworthyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-27· cited 19×
- State v. LykinsCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Adams County· 2017-12-14· cited 16×
- State v. SimmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-02-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.