State v. Burks
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 72
Syllabus
Guilty plea Crim.R. 11 knowing, intelligent, voluntary recommended sentence ineffective assistance of counsel presentence investigation. Appellant's guilty plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary where the record demonstrates that the trial court complied with Crim.R. 11 and conducted a thorough plea colloquy. The trial court was not required to explicitly ask appellant whether any threats or promises had been made in exchange for his plea. Nothing in the record supports appellant's assertion that he was promised an eight-year sentence. Trial counsel was not ineffective where the terms of the plea agreement were extensively explained to appellant. The use of a presentence investigation from a prior case does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. DrummondOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-18· cited 390×
- Hayward v. Summa Health System/Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 86×
- Wagner v. Roche LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court· 1999-05-12· cited 74×
- State v. CummingsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-27· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.