Court of Appeals of Kansas· 12/28/1990
State v. Burks
Citations
- 803 P.2d 587
- 15 Kan. App. 2d 87
- 1990 Kan. App. LEXIS 956
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the court had applied Mimms and “also relied on Mimms to find that removing an occupant from a car did not violate the Fourth Amendment” but finding that officers were not justified in ordering passenger from car and pat-frisking him without articulable suspicion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Rulon, Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- United States v. Anthony HardnettSixth Circuit· 1986-11-06· cited 127×
- State v. EppersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-07-26· cited 102×
- United States v. Thomas H. Taylor, Jr., A/K/A Seifullah Rahman, United States of America v. Vernon A. Collins, A/K/A Bey BrotherFourth Circuit· 1988-09-13· cited 95×
- State v. DammSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-03-02· cited 54×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-11-03· cited 38×
- State v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1987-10-08· cited 26×
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-03-25· cited 19×
- State v. GuySupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-03-25· cited 14×
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-01-19· cited 5×
- State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1989-02-17· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.