Skip to main content

State v. Burke

Citations

  • 2011 UT App 168
  • 256 P.3d 1102
  • 683 Utah Adv. Rep. 8
  • 2011 Utah App. LEXIS 169
  • 2011 WL 2043451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that implication of improper influence, for Utah Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) purposes, was established when defense counsel elicited testimony from child suggesting that the prosecutors and police officers had told her what to say

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Mehucgh, Roth, McHugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.