State v. Burk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the appellant in this case had a constitutional right to show, if he could, that it was reasonably necessary for him to kill these elk for the protection of his property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Vander Houwen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 29×
• Cross v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1962-04-10· cited 19×
• State Of Washington v. Robert E. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-10-08· cited 8×
• State v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-06· cited 3×
• State v. Bailey
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-06-28· cited 3×
• State v. Vander Houwen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-07-12· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Gilbert
  Franklin County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1924-04-22· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Hagan
  Elk County Court of Common Pleas· 2000-01-03· cited 1×
• State v. Brinkman
  Hancock County Court of Common Pleas· 1941-01-31
• Commonwealth v. Grove
  Huntingdon County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1967-10-23

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hubbard v. Preston
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1892-02-05· cited 13×
• Hunt v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1892-01-20· cited 4×
• Harrington v. Hall
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1906-05-03· cited 1×