Skip to main content

State v. Burdett

Citations

  • 762 P.2d 164
  • 70 Haw. 85
  • 1988 Haw. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when making a determination under the statutory equivalent of 11 Del.C. § 206(b), a court must employ a two-prong analysis which requires first the application of the subsection (b)(1) and then the application of (b)(2) or (b)(3)
  • HRS § 711-1106(1)(b) also seeks to “preserve public peace and order” by outlawing conduct which has an adverse “impact on one’s psyche and mental well-being”
  • “[A] lesser ... offense is necessarily included in a charge of the greater if the proof necessary to establish the greater offense will of necessity establish the lesser offense.”
  • \[A] lesser . . . offense is necessarily included in a charge of the greater if the proof necessary to establish the greater offense will of necessity establish the lesser offense.\
  • “ter-roristic threatening requires a mental state that is intentional or reckless.”
  • \terroristic threatening requires a mental state that is intentional or reckless.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.