State v. Burak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant may be convicted of two crimes that derive from same conduct where state able to prove beyond reasonable doubt essential elements of each crime
• ‘‘[o]ur Supreme Court has rejected the doctrine which would merge the act of kidnapping into the other crime charged where the kidnapping was merely incidental to such crime’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Green
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-11-09· cited 16×
• Hinds v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-08-05

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Connecticut v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 606×
• State v. Amarillo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-01-14· cited 130×
• State v. Chetcuti
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-06-07· cited 121×
• State v. Vass
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-12-20· cited 82×
• State v. Briggs
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-12-18· cited 81×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-08-04· cited 55×
• State v. Dubina
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-11-22· cited 44×
• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-04-17· cited 34×
• State v. DeWitt
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-06-12· cited 26×