Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 9/17/1982
State v. Bundy
Citations
- 450 A.2d 495
- 52 Md. App. 456
- 1982 Md. App. LEXIS 347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- referring to local 30-day rule giving trial court authority to revise a judgment after its entry
- referring to local 30-day rule giving trial court authority to revise a judgment after its entry
- finding jurisdiction over State’s appeal from denial of motion for reconsideration and reviewing the denial under an abuse of discretion standard
- finding jurisdiction over State’s appeal from denial of motion for reconsideration and reviewing the denial under an abuse of discretion standard
- “Because a post conviction proceeding is deemed to be civil in nature, the channels of review may be different from those provided for ordinary criminal cases. (See Standards for Criminal Justice, Post Conviction Remedies, § 22-5.1, Commentary [1980]
- “[A] post conviction proceeding is deemed to be civil in nature[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan, Wilner, Garrity
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Griffin v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-08-04· cited 17×
- Newton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-07-07· cited 13×
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-10· cited 4×
- State v. ArmstrongCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-08· cited 3×
- Dept. of Health v. SheffieldCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-07-29
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 607×
- State v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-03-21· cited 45×
- Young v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-11-15· cited 29×
- Eshelman Motors Corp. Ex Rel. Ottenheimer v. ScheftelCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-04-11· cited 28×
- Hanley v. StulmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-04-29· cited 21×
- S. & G. Realty Co. v. Woodmoor Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-12-03· cited 19×
- Cramer v. Wildwood Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-12-05· cited 17×
- Kaplan v. BachCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-05-17· cited 11×
- Noble v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-07-09· cited 10×
- Buffin v. HernandezCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-12-05· cited 9×
- Adelburg v. StryjewskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1952-06-13· cited 6×
- Eisenhardt v. PapaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-07-15· cited 4×
- Carder v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-03-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.