· 10/8/2021

State v. Bulluck

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 3613

Syllabus

We find no arguable merit to this appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant entered guilty pleas to burglary and violation of a protection order, and he was sentenced to 36 months in prison for each offense, to be served consecutively. The trial court conducted a complete and comprehensive Crim.R. 11 colloquy and found that appellant had knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered his pleas. The trial court made the consecutive sentence findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) at sentencing and included them in the final entry. Appellant had four prior offenses for violations of protection orders involving the same victim, one of which resulted in a prior prison term in total, appellant had seven prior offenses involving the same victim. There are no non-frivolous issues supporting any potential assignment of error of arguable merit. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.