State v. Bullock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where there is dispute as to existence of stipulation, polygraph evidence admissible only if parties have executed a written agreement
• where there is dispute as to existence of stipulation, polygraph evidence admissible only if parties have executed a written agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-10· cited 165×
• United States v. Julio Piccinonna
  Eleventh Circuit· 1989-09-28· cited 125×
• Commonwealth v. Mendes
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-12-11· cited 38×
• Mikel W. Houston v. A.L. Lockhart, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction
  Eighth Circuit· 1993-01-08· cited 20×
• Holcomb v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-02-25· cited 6×
• Mikel W. Houston v. A.L. Lockhart, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction
  Eighth Circuit· 1992-04-29· cited 3×
• Whiteside v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1984-09-26· cited 3×
• John Krieger v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2025-03-05· cited 1×
• Golston v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1988-12-21

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Valdez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1962-05-23· cited 193×
• Foots v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1975-09-15· cited 15×
• Lang v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1975-09-15· cited 11×