State v. Bullock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress allegedly tainted in-court identification testimony was harmless because substantial independent evidence of defendant’s guilt was before jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Eldredge
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-02-01· cited 147×
• State v. Ashe
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-11-12· cited 73×
• State v. Petersen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1991-04-04· cited 31×
• State v. Lenaburg
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-09-28· cited 19×
• State v. Genovesi
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1995-12-29· cited 16×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Neil v. Biggers
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
• Lego v. Twomey
  Supreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
• State v. McCumber
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 61×
• State v. Cole
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-11-17· cited 43×
• State v. Tuttle
  Utah Supreme Court· 1965-03-09· cited 26×