State v. Bulger

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 373

Syllabus

Postconviction; DNA testing; outcome determinative. Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it rejected Bulger's application for postconviction DNA testing on the basis that exclusion results would not be outcome determinative. In the context of the evidence presented at trial and upon its consideration, we cannot say that there is a strong probability that no reasonable factfinder would have found the defendant guilty of the offenses had exclusion results been presented at trial.