State v. Buhl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dissimilarities between Spreigl offense and charged offense outweighed similarities, making Spreigl evidence inadmissible
• stating the similarities “need not be great”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bolte
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-04-14· cited 98×
• State v. Sebasky
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-04-23· cited 15×
• State v. Hendrickson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-02-28· cited 8×
• State v. Keeton
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-12-30· cited 4×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Spreigl
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-17· cited 368×
• State v. Filippi
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-07-01· cited 78×
• State v. DeWald
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-01-18· cited 76×
• State v. Slowinski
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-01-12· cited 73×
• State v. Norris
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-08-05· cited 61×
• State v. Moorman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-09-17· cited 43×
• State v. Crocker
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-07-24· cited 41×
• Effinger v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-01-17· cited 32×
• State v. Hawkins
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-01-21· cited 31×
• State v. Landin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-08-02· cited 24×
• State v. Kumpula
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-09-21· cited 13×
• Seelye v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-09-27· cited 10×
• State v. Kilker
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-02-10· cited 5×
• State v. Perez
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-12-23· cited 2×