State v. Buford

Citations

• 52 La. Ann. 539

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. The testimony of a third person, as to what the wife of the accused said some time before the occurrence, is not admissible, and its rejection, by the court, affords no ground to reverse the Verdict.</p> <p>2. The information qualified the intent as “felonious” and afforded no ground of complaint on that score.</p> <p>3. The duplicity pleaded is not sustained by the facts. The words used in describing the offence tended to the one act and circumstance constituting the offence.</p>