State v. Buell
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3102
Syllabus
The failure to require the jury to distinguish on the verdict form whether appellant was found guilty as a principal or a complicitor did not amount to plain error warranting reversal. Appellant's convictions for breaking and entering and theft were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the state presented evidence that appellant forcibly trespassed into the victim's barn and removed more than $1,000 worth of tools from it before fleeing from law enforcement.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2001-09-26· cited 585×
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 457×
- State v. BirosOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 432×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-22· cited 192×
- State v. GrinsteadOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-20· cited 120×
- State v. BlankenburgOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-26· cited 99×
- Duniek Christian v. Randell WellingtonSixth Circuit· 2014-01-07· cited 60×
- State v. LynnOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-09· cited 51×
- State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-16· cited 22×
- State v. HortonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-26· cited 12×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-24· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.