State v. Buckner
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2615
Syllabus
CRIM.R. 16(I) FAILURE TO DISCLOSE WITNESS CRIM.R. 29(A) SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing an undisclosed witness to testify. Even though the state failed to disclose the witness's name and address on its witness list, the trial court's decision to allow the undisclosed witness to testify at trial was not unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable. The defendant-appellant's conviction for menacing is based on insufficient evidence because the state failed to present any evidence to establish the fear-of-physical-harm element. As to the defendant-appellant's conviction for improper use of a 911 system, the state presented sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that the defendant-appellant knowingly called 911 for a purpose other than obtaining emergency service.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. TenaceOhio Supreme Court· 2006-05-31· cited 413×
- State v. HeinishOhio Supreme Court· 1990-04-25· cited 259×
- State v. HurleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-23· cited 24×
- State v. McConnaugheyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-22· cited 10×
- State v. CoxOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-31· cited 4×
- State v. ValdezOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-23· cited 4×
- State v. RankinOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-11· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.