Skip to main content

State v. Buckner

Citations

  • 214 N.W.2d 164
  • 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no offer of proof necessary when the evidence sought to be admitted was obvious from the context within which the evidentiary issue arose
  • holding a defendant does not preserve error when he fails to request an instruction containing his legal issue or fails to object to the instructions given for not containing his legal issue
  • stating that \(the requirement that reputation testimony be based on comments from a cross-section of a community as opposed to a narrow group or class is intended to assure the reliability of the opinion.\); United States v. Perry, 643 F.2d 38, 52 (24 Cir.1981
  • “reputation testimony [must] be based on comments from a cross-section of the community as opposed to a naiTow group or class ... to assure the reliability of the opinion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Rawl-Ings, Legrand, Reynoldson, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.