State v. Buckley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• condemnees not entitled to an award under RCW 8.25.070 because they had waived trial as to amount of compensation and accepted the amount offered by the State
• condemnees not entitled to an award under RCW 8.25.070 because they had waived trial as to amount of compensation and accepted the amount offered by the State
• condemnees were not entitled to an award under RCW 8.25.070, which applies if a trial is held to fix compensation for condemned property, because they had waived trial and accepted the amount offered by the State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sintra, Inc. v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-14· cited 160×
• Olympic Pipe Line Co. v. Thoeny
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-23· cited 18×
• State v. Costich
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-06-19· cited 5×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cascade Security Bank v. Butler
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-07-14· cited 56×
• Vannoy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1962-03-15· cited 40×
• State ex rel. Peel v. Clausen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1917-01-02· cited 36×
• City of Snohomish v. Joslin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-08-06· cited 34×
• Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Water Power Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1953-11-06· cited 30×
• State v. Calkins
  Washington Supreme Court· 1959-07-23· cited 15×
• State v. Kodama
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1971-04-12· cited 13×
• Greenwood v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-05-02· cited 2×