Skip to main content
· 12/28/1979

State v. Buckle

Citations

  • 604 P.2d 743
  • 4 Kan. App. 2d 250
  • 1979 Kan. App. LEXIS 286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing the procedure under a prior, substantially similar version of K.S.A. 22-2807.
  • a notice which does not fairly apprise a party of the action proposed to be taken is no notice at all
  • \The statute requires only . . . that there has been a forfeiture and that it has not been set aside.\
  • noting the use of the word “shall” in 22-2807[l]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foth, Abbott, Meyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.