Skip to main content

State v. Buck

Citations

  • 756 P.2d 700
  • 84 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1988 Utah LEXIS 57
  • 1988 WL 55792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that suppression is not required where police forcefully entered premises mistakenly thinking they were executing a no-knock warrant, target residence was unoccupied at time of entry, and police properly announced their presence when defendant arrived at scene
  • finding evidence admissible even though police failed to announce presence and intent pri- or to entry as required by warrant because target residence was unoccupied at time of entry
  • violation of \knock-and-announce\ rule did not require suppression when no one was at home at the time of the search to respond to the knock
  • violation of “knock-and-announce” rule did not require suppression when no one was at home at the time of the search to respond to the knock

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Hall, Howe, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.