Utah Supreme Court· 6/6/1988
State v. Buck
Citations
- 756 P.2d 700
- 84 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
- 1988 Utah LEXIS 57
- 1988 WL 55792
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that suppression is not required where police forcefully entered premises mistakenly thinking they were executing a no-knock warrant, target residence was unoccupied at time of entry, and police properly announced their presence when defendant arrived at scene
- finding evidence admissible even though police failed to announce presence and intent pri- or to entry as required by warrant because target residence was unoccupied at time of entry
- violation of \knock-and-announce\ rule did not require suppression when no one was at home at the time of the search to respond to the knock
- violation of “knock-and-announce” rule did not require suppression when no one was at home at the time of the search to respond to the knock
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Hall, Howe, Durham, Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court· 1993-01-07· cited 251×
- State v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-02-08· cited 30×
- State v. RoweUtah Supreme Court· 1992-09-28· cited 21×
- State v. BilancioNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-02-19· cited 13×
- State v. ZesigerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-02-13· cited 3×
- State v. SchimpfCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-05-02· cited 2×
- State v. RibeCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-05-26· cited 2×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 885×
- Dalia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-04-18· cited 639×
- Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 529×
- State v. MendozaUtah Supreme Court· 1987-12-01· cited 78×
- State v. HyghUtah Supreme Court· 1985-08-16· cited 58×
- Diamond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1978-08-29· cited 57×
- United States v. Frank GervatoThird Circuit· 1973-01-26· cited 49×
- State v. VrtiskaNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-05-22· cited 48×
- Charles Edward Payne v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1975-03-05· cited 40×
- State v. BishopOregon Supreme Court· 1980-01-22· cited 34×
- State v. CervantesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-03-08· cited 33×
- State v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-02-27· cited 30×
- State v. FarberSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-01-20· cited 25×
- State v. KentUtah Supreme Court· 1967-09-22· cited 19×
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-03-07· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.