State v. Buchanan
Citations
- 29 Wash. 602
- 59 L.R.A. 342
- 70 P. 52
- 1902 Wash. LEXIS 621
Syllabus
<p>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — LÍBERTY OF CONTRACT — REGULATION OF HOURS OF EMPLOYMENT OF FEMALES.</p> <p>The act of 1901 regulating and limiting the hours of employment of females in an]r mechanical or mercantile establishment (Laws 1901, p. 118), by forbidding their employment for more than ten hours during any day, is a legitimate exercise of the police power of the state, enacted for the welfare of society at large, and therefore constitutional, although a restriction to some extent upon the right of women to contract their labor. (Seattle v. Smyth, 22 Wash. 327, distinguished.)</p>
Judges: Dunbar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court· 1911-09-27· cited 213×
- William Hibbs, United States of America, Intervenor v. Department of Human Resources Charlotte Crawford Nikki FirpoNinth Circuit· 2001-12-11· cited 88×
- Commonwealth v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1912-01-01· cited 29×
- State v. MullerOregon Supreme Court· 1906-06-26· cited 24×
- State v. SomervilleWashington Supreme Court· 1912-03-26· cited 21×
- State v. BuntingOregon Supreme Court· 1914-03-17· cited 20×
- Withey v. BloemMichigan Supreme Court· 1910-12-07· cited 16×
- Court of Industrial Relations v. Charles Wolff Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1921-10-08· cited 10×
- Stoll v. Pacific Coast S. S. Co.W.D. Washington· 1913-04-28· cited 9×
- Broad v. WoydtWashington Supreme Court· 1904-12-30· cited 8×
- State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court· 1943-03-16· cited 4×
- Ex parte HawleyCourt of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division· 1911-10-07
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ritchie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1895-03-14· cited 132×
- Ah Lim v. Territory of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court· 1890-02-28· cited 110×
- Commonwealth v. Hamilton Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1876-05-06· cited 36×
- Ex parte KubackCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-08-04· cited 21×
- City of Seattle v. SmythWashington Supreme Court· 1900-04-06· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.