State v. Bryson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of memory loss due to prosecutorial delay held not sufficient to present a picture of such prejudice amounting to a denial of due process
• evidence of memory loss insufficient in that case to establish prejudice under due process clause of Hawaii State Constitution and Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution
• evidence of memory loss due to prosecutorial delay held not sufficient to present a picture of such prejudice amounting to a denial of due process
• seven and one-half month delay between sale and indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Serna v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1985-10-24· cited 106×
• State v. O'DANIEL
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1980-09-25· cited 71×
• State v. Speed
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-05-29· cited 44×
• State v. White
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1999-12-30· cited 34×
• Yarbor v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-02-23· cited 27×
• State v. Almeida
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1973-05-01· cited 26×
• State v. English
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1979-05-11· cited 24×
• State v. Wasson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-08-29· cited 23×
• State v. Crail
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-10-30· cited 19×
• Hawaii v. Nihipali
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1981-11-30· cited 18×
• State v. Smith
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1978-09-13· cited 15×
• People v. Lawson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-05-13· cited 13×
• State v. Durry
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1983-05-18· cited 12×
• State v. English
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1978-05-11· cited 12×
• State v. Higa
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2003-07-29· cited 12×
• State v. Dunphy
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1990-09-21· cited 9×
• State v. Mitchell
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1980-08-05· cited 1×