Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/22/1996
State v. Bruno
Citations
- 473 S.E.2d 450
- 322 S.C. 534
- 1996 S.C. LEXIS 131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant was not entitled to a self-defense charge where he presented no evidence that he believed that he was in imminent danger when he shot the victim
- holding that the defendant was not entitled to a self-defense charge where he presented no evidence that he believed that he was in imminent danger when he shot the victim
- finding that appellant was not entitled to a self-defense charge, because he presented no evidence that he believed he was in imminent danger of losing his life or sustaining serious bodily injury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SantiagoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 49×
- State v. LightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-07-14· cited 39×
- State v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 36×
- State v. ChatmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-08-02· cited 27×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-07-21· cited 12×
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-08-08· cited 7×
- Bruno v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-12-03· cited 5×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-06-18· cited 97×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-07-06· cited 60×
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-03-06· cited 48×
- State v. GoodsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-17· cited 46×
- State v. LongworthSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-10-25· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.